National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery

REVIEW ARTICLE
Year
: 2021  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 139--161

Evidence mapping and quality analysis of published dental literature on COVID-19 – A systematic review


Morankar Rahul1, Nitesh Tewari1, Vijay Mathur1, Shubhi Goel1, Gunjar Jain2,  
1 Division of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Centre for Dental Education and Research, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Orthopaedics, AIIMS, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Morankar Rahul
Division of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Centre for Dental Education and Research, AIIMS, New Delhi
India

Abstract

A large number of scientific articles have been published regarding impact of COVID-19 infection on dental practice, dental professionals, and the mode of spread of infection via dental procedures. The present systematic review was planned with an aim of evidence mapping and quality analysis of published research on the dental aspects of COVID-19 infection. The protocol was registered at https://share. osf.io/registration/46221-C87-BA8. The search was performed in Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases till 15th July 2020. There was no restriction of year of publication and language. All types of published articles related to Dentistry, Dentist, Dental practice, and Oral health education on COVID-19 were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools were used for the risk of bias analysis of included studies. A total of 393 articles were short-listed and were checked for eligibility and finally, 380 articles were included. Among the 380 research articles published (till July 15, 2020), the majority of the included articles belonged to the lowermost strata of the evidence pyramid. There were 54 original research articles with no randomized clinical trial, systematic review or, meta-analysis pertaining to the dental perspective of COVID-19 infection. The level of available evidence about dentistry and COVID-19 infection is very low with a lack of researches of highest quality. The guidelines/recommendations for dental professionals, proposed by the different scientific organizations/societies regarding COVID-19 infection are only consensus-based necessitating the need to formulate evidence-based guidelines. There is a need to identify essential research questions and strengthen the study designs in most of the aspects related to the dentistry and COVID-19 pandemic.



How to cite this article:
Rahul M, Tewari N, Mathur V, Goel S, Jain G. Evidence mapping and quality analysis of published dental literature on COVID-19 – A systematic review.Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2021;12:139-161


How to cite this URL:
Rahul M, Tewari N, Mathur V, Goel S, Jain G. Evidence mapping and quality analysis of published dental literature on COVID-19 – A systematic review. Natl J Maxillofac Surg [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 5 ];12:139-161
Available from: https://www.njms.in/text.asp?2021/12/2/139/321441


Full Text



 Introduction



An illness similar to common flu with high infectivity and signs similar to pneumonia was reported in Wuhan city of China in December 2019. The condition spread rapidly to different parts of china in January 2020 and later started gripping the globe in February 2020. The investigation to find out the etiology of the infection had led to the characterization and isolation of a virus termed as the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV).[1] This is an enveloped RNA virus comprising of strains leading to respiratory syndromes such as SARS and MERS. The 2019-nCoV has found to have wide distribution, genetic recombination, and a higher rate of infection.[2],[3]

The main infective pathways of SARS-CoV-2 are airborne and direct contact.[4] Coughing, sneezing, exhalation, or speaking are the common routes of the airborne infection that occurs through the released droplets. As they settle and contaminate the surfaces, any contact subsequent touching to eyes, nose, and mouth leads to COVID-19 infection.[3],[4],[5] The role of saliva has also been implicated in the spread of infection.[6],[7],[8],[9]

Since the emergence of this pandemic, there has been a panic among the dental fraternity across the world, especially regarding the possible spread of this infection through dental operatories. The cross-sectional studies evaluating the knowledge, attitude, and practice in dental professionals regarding the spread of COVID-19 infection through the dental procedures have also reported a high level of concern in them.[10],[11] There has been a sense of fear, anxiety, and reluctance among dental professionals to continue their dental practice in the pandemic.[12] Even the World Health Organization had released a series of guidelines (last published on August 3, 2020) advised to delay the routine nonessential oral health services until there has been sufficient reduction in COVID-19 transmission rates.[13] However, the American Dental Association in their opinion (released on August 13, 2019) strongly disagrees with these recommendations to delay routine dental care.[14] To an extent this belief is justified, since the oral cavity is in direct communication with the respiratory system which harbors the virus and aerosol generating dental procedures can pose threat to the operators, auxiliaries, and the patients.[15],[16]

After the start of the current pandemic, there are thousands of scientists working on various aspects of Coronavirus origin, epidemiology, demographic distribution, clinical symptoms, diseases progression, after effects, recovery time, prevention, and vaccination. The profession of dentistry is also largely affected by the current pandemic and there are many areas in which research is undergoing with respect to COVID-19 pandemic and dental profession as a whole. However, some of the areas are being investigated more and some are not. The published literature is quite discrete, which makes it difficult to draw any conclusion. This article is aimed at evidence mapping of the available literature, its quality analysis and pointing at areas of gap and future research.

 Methods



This systematic review was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines and principles of Global Evidence Mapping.[17],[18] The protocol was registered with https://osf.io/registries (Registration/46221-C87-BA8).

Information sources

The search was performed in Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases till July 15, 2020. There was no restriction of year of publication and language. Google Scholar and Open Grey search were performed for grey literature. To identify the additional studies the Cross references of eligible studies were checked. Hand searching was also performed in general and specialty journals of dentistry. Two authors (NT and MR) performed the literature search and study selection independently as per the predefined search strategy. Any disagreement was resolved after consultation with the senior reviewer (VM).

Search strategy

The four reviewers (NT, VPM, SG, and MR) identified the possible domains and subdomains which could be focused for identifying the available dentistry related literature on COVID-19 infection. They were finalized after a focused group discussion in two stages within the review team.

A broad-based search was implemented using the text words and MeSH terms. The key words were: “Dentistry”, “Dentist”, “Dental practice”, “Saliva”, “Aerosol”, “Oral Health”, “Oral disease”, “Periodontics”, “Pediatric dentistry”, “Prosthodontics”, “Endodontics”, “Orthodontics”, “Oral Surgery”, “Oral Pathology”, “Community dentistry”, “Public Health Dentitsry”, “Conservative Dentistry”, “Oral diagnosis”, “Oral Radiology”. Partial searches with “AND” and “OR” were done with the above keywords individually with “Covid-19”,”Corona virus” and “SARS-COV-2”. The strategy used for partial search was (1) Search ((Dentistry OR Dentist) OR Dental practice) (2) Search ((((Saliva) OR Aerosol) OR Oral Health) OR Oral disease) OR Periodontics) OR Pediatric dentistry) OR Prosthodontics OR Endodontics OR Orthodontics OR Oral Surgery) OR Oral Pathology) OR Community dentistry) (3) Search (((((((((((((Corona virus OR SARS-COV-2 OR Covid-19. The duplicates were removed and titles and abstracts were assessed for their eligibility as per inclusion criteria.

Study selection and eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria-1

All types of published articles (In vitro studies/Background information/Expert opinion/Letter to editor/Case series or Case reports/Cohort studies/Case-control studies/Non-randomized clinical trials/Randomized clinical trials/Critically appraised topics (Evidence synthesis and guidelines)/Systematic reviews/Meta-analysis). (2) Dentistry, Dentist, Dental practice and Oral health education related research articles on SARS-COV-2 with no restriction of language.

Exclusion criteria-1

Researches related to virus other than SARS-COV-2. 2. Researches not relevant to dentistry, dentist, dental practice, and oral health education.

Data collection process

The self-designed sheets, pilot-tested (tested on two included studies) were used for data extraction pertaining to different categories of studies. Two calibrated reviewers (MR and NT) collected the data from the included studies. The inter reviewer agreement for different variables was found to be high with Cohen's kappa values ranging from 0.68 to 0.82. In case of any disagreement, the third reviewer (GJ) was consulted and it was resolved by consensus.

Assessment of risk of bias

The included studies were assessed for their methodological quality using the JBI Critical Appraisal Tools.[19] The case reports, case series and all the included research articles (except editorials, expert opinion, letter to editor, narrative reviews) were analyzed for their methodological quality using respective JBI tools and divided into high, moderate, and low risk of bias (ROB). The scores were assigned to each of the included study pertaining the points applicable to methodological quality assessment, and on the basis of the scores, they were categorized into high (score 75% and above), moderate (score 50%–74%), and low ROB (score below 50%).

Statistical analysis

The included studies showed wide variations in the population, aim, objectives, outcome variables, and tools used for their assessment. Considering the heterogeneity of data, it was only analyzed for the descriptive characteristics without meta-analysis. Cohen's kappa statistics was used to determine inter-reviewer agreement.

 Results



Study selection

The search conducted in different electronic databases identified 2432 articles. Twenty-five additional records were found through other sources. A total of 393 full-text articles were short-listed after removal of duplicates and evaluation of titles and abstracts. They were further assessed for eligibility and finally 380 articles were included. The details of the search have been presented as PRISMA chart [Figure 1]. The excluded studies and reasons are presented in [Appendix Table 1].[S1],[S2],[S3],[S4],[S5],[S6],[S7],[S8],[S9],[S10],[S11],[S12],[S13] The included studies were arranged in an Evidence-based pyramid according to their levels of evidence [Figure 2].[20] The ideas, editorials, letter to the editors, opinions, and narrative reviews were mapped in the present SR but not subjected to quality assessment or ROB analysis. However, the remaining articles (in vitro studies, case series or case reports, cohort studies, case–control studies, and cross-sectional studies) were included in the quality assessment. The global distribution of studies included in the quality analysis is shown in [Figure 3].{Figure 1}{Figure 2}{Figure 3}[INLINE:1]

Study characteristics

[Figure 2] shows the level of evidence of available literature pertaining to the dental perspective of SARS-COV-2. Among the 380 research articles published till July 15, 2020, the majority of the included articles belonged to the lowermost strata's of the evidence pyramid. There were 54 original articles with no randomized clinical trial, systematic review, or meta-analysis.

It was observed that 12 scientific bodies had issued guidelines/recommendations [Table 1] related to dental perspectives of novel SARS-COV-2 infection.[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32] All of them were consensus based and majority had been issued for general dentists with only few targeted for specialists such as oral-maxillofacial surgeons. Majority of them were aimed at infection control and precautions related to dental procedures during SARS-COV-2 pandemic.{Table 1}

The characteristics of questionnaire-based studies are given in [Appendix Table 2].[S14],[S15],[S16],[S17],[S18],[S19],[S20],[S21],[S22],[S23],[S24],[S25],[S26],[S27],[S28],[S29],[S30],[S31],[S32],[S33],[S34],[S35],[S36],[S37],[S38] It was found that nine out of 25 studies had assessed the knowledge, attitude, and behavior of dental professionals regarding COVID-19 infection and reported that majority of the participants were aware of its etiopathogenesis, symptoms, and transmission. Although most of the dental professionals considered it as moderately dangerous and very few were confident of avoiding the infection in their clinics. Six studies which evaluated fear and anxiety among dental professionals and patients undergoing dental treatment reported that the majority of dental professionals were in psychological distress and had changed their patient management protocol. Several of them reported to have performed only the emergency dental procedures in the pandemic. Similarly, patients undergoing treatments in the dental clinics expressed concerns about acquiring SARS-COV-2 infection during their treatments. Majority of them also believed that the dentists belonged to a high-risk category. [Appendix Table 2] also described the results of questionnaire-based studies evaluating the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on functioning of dental academic institutions and the knowledge and attitude of the parents of pediatric patients toward dental treatments, appointments, and the oral symptoms associated with the COVID-19 infection.[INLINE:2]

The results of studies elucidating the role of saliva in detection of COVID-19 and its contagion are presented in [Appendix Table 3].[7],[8],[9],[S39],[S40],[S41],[S42],[S43],[S44],[S45],[S46],[S47],[S48],[S49],[S50],[S51],[S52],[S53],[S54] It was observed that the majority of included studies evaluated the role of saliva in COVID-19 diagnosis and found it to be a reliable method of diagnosis. Similarly, there were studies which compared the reliability of saliva with nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs. They reported it to be equivalent or slightly less sensitive and/or specific but emphasized its utility as an alternative detection method, due to the ease of collection/self-collection, greater acceptance of the patients and lower risks involved during sample collection.[INLINE:3]

The included studies comprised of four case reports and case series each related to dentistry and SARS-COV-2 [Table 2].[33],[34],[35],[36],[37],[38],[39],[40] They did not report any specific oral manifestation related to SARS-COV-2 infection. It was further stated that the ones present might have developed as a consequence of the treatment regimen administered. In an assessment of the salivary viral loads, it was reported that early morning samples were of greater diagnostic importance and showed higher titers of viral RNA as compared to the nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs in early stage of disease.[33],[34]{Table 2}

The other studies included in this systematic review were focused on the application of tele-dentistry for patient management and the web-based teaching methods for dental students during the SARS-COV-2 pandemic [Table 3].[41],[42],[43],[44],[45],[46],[47],[48],[49],[50] Few in vitro and human experiments had also been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of mouthwashes for reducing the viral loads, and reported a positive effect.[49],[50]{Table 3}

Quality assessment of individual studies according to the JBI Critical appraisal tools

There was substantial agreement (75%) between the two reviewers (MR and SG) in quality assessment of the studies. Among the 25 questionnaire-based studies, six were found to have high ROB, while 14 had moderate and five had low ROB [Supplementary Figure 1]. Majority of studies had not assessed the validity and reliability of questionnaires used in their study. Similarly, among the 19 studies which had focused on the potential role of saliva in COVID-19 diagnosis, low ROB was observed in 10 studies, moderate risk bias in nine and none of the included studies had high ROB when assessed for methodological quality [Table 1]. Out of the eight case reports/series, only one case series had moderate ROB while all other had a low ROB [Supplementary Figure 2]. Among the 10 miscellaneous studies included, two had high ROB whereas four each had moderate and low ROB [Table 3].[INLINE:4][INLINE:5]

 Discussion



The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the livelihood of almost all the human beings across the globe. Many small-scale and large-scale industries including oral health care have suffered a significant loss during this pandemic. Dentistry, dental practice, and dental practitioners have suffered psychological, emotional, and economic impact primarily due to the scare of the spread of infection associated with the dental procedures along with its potential risk to the dental practitioners. There have been several publications, during this pandemic, which aim to evaluate the potential role of saliva in COVID-19 diagnosis and its comparison with the conventional oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swab technique. There were other research articles identifying the oral manifestations of COVID-19, evaluating the impact on dental education and the effect of mouth rinse used for disinfection of oral cavity on COVID-19.

An evidence pyramid helps to categorize the quality of evidence of the published literature addressing a research question. In this systematic review, we have included 380 research articles pertaining to the dental perspective of COVID-19. The present SR observed that the majority of the included articles belonged to the lowest strata of the evidence pyramid. There were 54 original articles (including two in vitro trials) with no randomized clinical trial, systematic review, or meta-analysis published pertaining to the dental aspect of COVID-19 infection. This exhibited significant paucity in the highest level of evidence. This further highlights the avenues for the primary and secondary researches for future.

The review identified 12 different guidelines/recommendations given by various scientific organizations/societies. However, it was observed that all the guidelines were consensus based without any quality evidence supporting them, especially from the literature which already existed before the emergence of COVID-19 infection as a pandemic. Although this is a novel virus, with less available literature/research, these guidelines/recommendations should have been based on the scientific literature related to similar kinds of viruses or the general principles of infection control. This necessitates the need to analyze the researches related to COVID-19 infection and formulate an evidence-based guideline pertaining to dental perspectives of this infection.

The results of questionnaire-based studies have shown that the dental professionals and the patients seeking oral health care are in significant psychological distress in this pandemic. Since the majority of these studies suffered from moderate to high ROB and lacked essential details regarding the development of questionnaires and their validity and/or reliability, it necessitates using caution before drawing any conclusion from these studies. Another interesting observation was that the fear, anxiety, and lack of confidence among dental professionals, even after having good scores of knowledge and attitude related to COVID-19 infection, this can be attributed to the lack of consensus about signs and symptoms of COVID-19 infection, lack of a proper protocol for infection control in dental operatory, and limited belief on the recommendations issued by the scientific associations. It is further warranted that there is a need to perform quality studies to address the concerns of dentists as well as patients coming to the dental operatory to reduce their fear of getting infection in the dental clinics.

According to the results of majority of studies included in this SR, saliva can be recommended as an alternative for the detection of COVID-19 to the nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs with good sensitivity and specificity. Although 10/19 studies showed low ROB, the sample size in majority of them was less. Similarly, it was observed that in early period of infection (first week) the saliva has more diagnostic potential as compared to the late stages. The use of the samples from the confirmed patients of COVID-19 can be regarded as a confounding factor, making it a less reliable alternative. Among the other studies, there was variability in research questions, scarcity of numbers and a moderate ROB. These areas must also be addressed in future researches for improving the understanding and management protocols of this infection.

 Conclusion



The level of available evidence pertaining to the dentistry and COVID-19 infection is very low with lack of researches of highest qualityThe guidelines/recommendations for dental professionals, proposed by the different scientific organizations/societies regarding COVID-19 infection are only consensus-based necessitating the need to formulate evidence-based guidelinesThe various surveys explain the good knowledge, attitude, and practices among dental professionals and patients; however, they also report significant fear and anxiety in several aspectsSaliva can serve as an alternative for diagnostic test of COVID-19 infection, however, there is need to specify indications and appropriate phase of infection for its accuracyThere is a need to identify essential research questions and strengthen the study designs in most of the aspects related to the dentistry and COVID-19 pandemic.

 Limitations



Inclusion criteria could have been more specific in order to fulfill a single-study objective rather than evaluating the all the published literatureAs the majority of published literature had low level of evidence and high/moderate ROB making the results of this SR less reliableLike all the evidence mappings, the present SR suffers from the limitation of the date of the last literature search. Since the SARS-COV-2-related medical and dental literature have been constantly increasing, there would have been some researches which could not be included in the present evidence mapping.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

S1. Wan DY, Luo XY, Dong W, Zhang ZW. Current practice and potential strategy in diagnosing COVID-19. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020;24:4548-53.

S2. Arizti-Sanz J, Freije CA, Stanton AC, Boehm CK, Petros BA, Siddiqui S, et al. Integrated sample inactivation, amplification, and Cas13-based detection of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Commun 2020;11:5921.

S3. Robson B. Bioinformatics studies on a function of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein as the binding of host sialic acid glycans. Comput Biol Med 2020;122:103849.

S4. Chan WM, Ip JD, Chu AW, Yip CC, Lo LS, Chan KH, et al. Identification of nsp1 gene as the target of SARS-CoV-2 real-time RT-PCR using nanopore whole-genome sequencing. J Med Virol 2020;92:2725-34.

S5. Cheng VC, Wong SC, Chuang VW, So SY, Chen JH, Sridhar S, et al. The role of community-wide wearing of face mask for control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic due to SARS-CoV-2. J Infect 2020;81:107-14.

S6. Muraca M, Pessina A, Pozzobon M, Dominici M, Galderisi U, Lazzari L, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells and their secreted extracellular vesicles as therapeutic tools for COVID-19 pneumonia? J Control Release 2020;325:135-40.

S7. Modi PD, Nair G, Uppe A, Modi J, Tuppekar B, Gharpure AS, et al. COVID-19 awareness among healthcare students and professionals in mumbai metropolitan region: a questionnaire-based Survey. Cureus 2020;12:e7514.

S8. Koletsi D, Belibasakis GN, Eliades T. Interventions to reduce aerosolized microbes in dental practice: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Dent Res 2020;99:1228-38.

S9. Ravenel TD, Kessler R, Comisi JC, Kelly A, Renne WG, Teich ST. Evaluation of the spatter-reduction effectiveness and aerosol containment of eight dry-field isolation techniques. Quintessence Int 2020;51:660-70.

S10. Ashok N, Rodrigues JC, Azouni K, Darwish S, Abuderman A, Alkaabba AA, et al. Knowledge and apprehension of dental patients about MERS-A questionnaire survey. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:ZC58-62.

S11. Baseer MA, Ansari SH, AlShamrani SS, Alakras AR, Mahrous R, Alenazi AM. Awareness of droplet and airborne isolation precautions among dental health professionals during the outbreak of corona virus infection in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia. J Clin Exp Dent 2016;8:e379-87.

S12. Elrggal ME, Karami NA, Rafea B, Alahmadi L, Al Shehri A, Alamoudi R, et al. Evaluation of preparedness of healthcare student volunteers against Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in Makkah, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. Z Gesundh Wiss 2018;26:607-12.

S13. Konda A, Prakash A, Moss GA, Schmoldt M, Grant GD, Guha S. Aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth masks. ACS Nano 2020;14:6339-47.

S14. Biadsee A, Biadsee A, Kassem F, Dagan O, Masarwa S, Ormianer Z. Olfactory and oral manifestations of COVID-19: Sex-related symptoms-a potential pathway to early diagnosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;163:722-8.

S15. Kamate SK, Sharma S, Thakar S, Srivastava D, Sengupta K, Hadi AJ, et al. Assessing knowledge, attitudes and practices of dental practitioners regarding the COVID-19 pandemic: A multinational study. Dent Med Probl 2020;57:11-7.

S16. Duruk G, Gümüşboğa ZŞ, Çolak C. Investigation of Turkish dentists' clinical attitudes and behaviors towards the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study. Braz Oral Res 2020;34:e054.

S17. Sun J, Xu Y, Qu Q, Luo W. Knowledge of and attitudes toward COVID-19 among parents of child dental patients during the outbreak. Braz Oral Res 2020;34:e066.

S18. Peloso RM, Pini NIP, Sundfeld Neto D, Mori AA, Oliveira RCG, Valarelli FP, et al. How does the quarantine resulting from COVID-19 impact dental appointments and patient anxiety levels? Braz Oral Res 2020;34:e84.

S19. Putrino A, Raso M, Magazzino C, Galluccio G. Coronavirus (COVID-19) in Italy: Knowledge, management of patients and clinical experience of Italian dentists during the spread of contagion. BMC Oral Health 2020;20:200.

S20. Quinn B, Field J, Gorter R, Akota I, Manzanares MC, Paganelli C, et al. COVID-19: The immediate response of european academic dental institutions and future implications for dental education. Eur J Dent Educ 2020;24:811-4.

S21. Ahmed MA, Jouhar R, Ahmed N, Aber H, Khawaja S, El Abed R, et al. Fear and practice modifications among dentists to combat novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:2821.

S22. Shacham M, Hamama-Raz Y, Kolerman R, Mijiritsky O, Ben-Ezra M, Mijiritsky E. COVID-19 factors and psychological factors associated with elevated psychological distress among dentists and dental hygienists in Israel. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:2900.

S23. Cagetti MG, Cairoli JL, Senna A, Campus G. COVID-19 outbreak in north italy: an overview on dentistry: A questionnaire Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:3835.

S24. De Stefani A, Bruno G, Mutinelli S, Gracco A. COVID-19 Outbreak Perception in Italian Dentists. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:3867.

S25. Tysiąc-Miśta M, Dziedzic A. The Attitudes and Professional Approaches of Dental Practitioners during the COVID-19 Outbreak in Poland: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:4703.

S26. Costa SM, Lacerda GT, Villafort RN, Silveira RL, Amaral MBF. What do we know about COVID-19?: Maxillofacial surgeons survey. J Craniofac Surg 2020;31:e661-3.

S27. Van Doren EJ, Lee JE, Breitman LS, Chutinan S, Ohyama H. Students' perceptions on dental education in the wake of the COVID 19 pandemic. J Dent Educ. 2020 Jul 5:10.1002/jdd.12300. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12300.

S28. Schwendicke F, Krois J, Gomez J. Impact of SARS-CoV2 (Covid-19) on dental practices: Economic analysis. J Dent 2020;99:103387.

S29. Blackhall KK, Downie IP, Ramchandani P, Kusanale A, Walsh S, Srinivasan B, et al. Provision of emergency maxillofacial service during the COVID-19 pandemic: A collaborative five centre UK study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;58:698-703.

S30. Quadri MF, Jafer MA, Alqahtani AS, Al Mutahar SA, Odabi NI, Daghriri AA, et al. Novel corona virus disease (COVID-19) awareness among the dental interns, dental auxiliaries and dental specialists in Saudi Arabia: A nationwide study. J Infect Public Health 2020;13:856-64.

S31. Cotrin P, Peloso RM, Oliveira RC, de Oliveira RCG, Pini NIP, Valarelli FP, et al. Impact of coronavirus pandemic in appointments and anxiety/concerns of patients regarding orthodontic treatment. Orthod Craniofac Res 2020;23:455-61.

S32. Khader Y, Al Nsour M, Al-Batayneh OB, Saadeh R, Bashier H, Alfaqih M, et al. Dentists' awareness, perception, and attitude regarding COVID-19 and infection control: cross-sectional study among Jordanian dentists. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2020;6:e18798.

S33. Abbasi S, Ayoob T, Malik A, Memon SI. Perceptions of students regarding E-learning during Covid-19 at a private medical college. Pak J Med Sci 2020;36:S57-S61.

S34. Gambhir RS, Dhaliwal JS, Aggarwal A, Anand S, Anand V, Bhangu AK. Covid-19: A survey on knowledge, awareness and hygiene practices among dental health professionals in an Indian scenario. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig 2020;71:223-9.

S35. Consolo U, Bellini P, Bencivenni D, Iani C, Checchi V. epidemiological aspects and psychological reactions to COVID-19 of dental practitioners in the northern Italy districts of Modena and Reggio Emilia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:2459.

S36. Martina S, Amato A, Rongo R, Caggiano M, Amato M. The perception of COVID-19 among Italian dentists: An orthodontic point of view. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:4384.

S37. González-Olmo MJ, Ortega-Martínez AR, Delgado-Ramos B, Romero-Maroto M, Carrillo-Diaz M. Perceived vulnerability to coronavirus infection: Impact on dental practice. Braz Oral Res 2020;34:e044.

S38. Huntley RE, Ludwig DC, Dillon JK. Early effects of COVID-19 on oral and maxillofacial surgery residency training-results from a national survey. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;78:1257-67.

S39. Chen JH, Yip CC, Poon RW, Chan KH, Cheng VC, Hung IF, et al. Evaluating the use of posterior oropharyngeal saliva in a point-of-care assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Emerg Microbes Infect 2020;9:1356-9.

S40. Wong RC, Wong AH, Ho YI, Leung EC, Lai RW. Evaluation on testing of deep throat saliva and lower respiratory tract specimens with Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay. J Clin Virol 2020;131:104593.

S41. Pasomsub E, Watcharananan SP, Boonyawat K, Janchompoo P, Wongtabtim G, Suksuwan W, et al. Saliva sample as a non-invasive specimen for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019: a cross-sectional study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021;27:285.e1-285.e4.

S42. Azzi L, Carcano G, Gianfagna F, Grossi P, Gasperina DD, Genoni A, et al. Saliva is a reliable tool to detect SARS-CoV-2. J Infect 2020;81:e45-50.

S43. Chu AW, Chan WM, Ip JD, Yip CC, Chan JF, Yuen KY, et al. Evaluation of simple nucleic acid extraction methods for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal and saliva specimens during global shortage of extraction kits. J Clin Virol 2020;129:104519.

S44. To KK, Tsang OT, Leung WS, Tam AR, Wu TC, Lung DC, et al. Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: An observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2020;20:565-74.

S45. Azzi L, Baj A, Alberio T, Lualdi M, Veronesi G, Carcano G, et al. Rapid Salivary Test suitable for a mass screening program to detect SARS-CoV-2: A diagnostic accuracy study. J Infect 2020;81:e75-8.

S46. Zhu J, Guo J, Xu Y, Chen X. Viral dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva from infected patients. J Infect 2020;81:e48-50.

S47. Iwasaki S, Fujisawa S, Nakakubo S, Kamada K, Yamashita Y, Fukumoto T, et al. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection in nasopharyngeal swab and saliva. J Infect 2020;81:e145-e147.

S48. Randad PR, Pisanic N, Kruczynski K, Manabe YC, Thomas D, Pekosz A, et al. COVID-19 serology at population scale: SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses in saliva. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2020 May 26:2020.05.24.20112300. doi: 10.1101/2020.05.24.20112300.

S49. Valentine-Graves M, Hall E, Guest JL, Adam E, Valencia R, Shinn K, et al. At-home self-collection of saliva, oropharyngeal swabs and dried blood spots for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and serology: Post-collection acceptability of specimen collection process and patient confidence in specimens. PLoS One 2020;15:e0236775.

S50. Faustini SE, Jossi SE, Perez-Toledo M, Shields A, Allen JD, Watanabe Y, et al. Detection of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein in both serum and saliva enhances detection of infection. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2020 Jun 18:2020.06.16.20133025. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.16.20133025.

S51. Hung DL, Li X, Chiu KH, Yip CC, To KK, Chan JF, et al. Early-morning vs spot posterior oropharyngeal saliva for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: Implication of timing of specimen collection for community-wide screening. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020;7:ofaa210.

S52. Lamb LE, Bartolone SN, Ward E, Chancellor MB. Rapid detection of novel coronavirus/severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification. PLoS One 2020;15:e0234682.

S53. Kam KQ, Yung CF, Maiwald M, Chong CY, Soong HY, Loo LH, et al. Clinical utility of buccal swabs for severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 detection in Coronavirus disease 2019-infected children. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2020;13;9:370-2.

S54. Han MS, Seong MW, Kim N, Shin S, Cho SI, Park H, et al. Viral RNA load in mildly symptomatic and asymptomatic children with COVID-19, Seoul, South Korea. Emerg Infect Dis 2020;26:2497-9.

References

1Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet 2020;395:470-3.
2Rehman SU, Shafique L, IhsanA, Liu Q. Evolutionary trajectory for the emergence of novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Pathogens 2020;9:240.
3Lupia T, Scabini S, Mornese Pinna S, Di Perri G, De Rosa FG, Corcione S. 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak: A new challenge. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2020;21:22-7.
4Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet 2020;395:507-13.
5Alhazzani W, Møller MH, Arabi YM, Loeb M, Gong MN, Fan E, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: Guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Intensive Care Med 2020;46:854-87.
6Liu L, Wei Q, Alvarez X, Wang H, Du Y, Zhu H, et al. Epithelial cells lining salivary gland ducts are early target cells of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection in the upper respiratory tracts of rhesus macaques. J Virol 2011;85:4025-30.
7Wei S, Kohl E, Djandji A, Morgan S, Whittier S, Mansukhani M, et al. Field-deployable, rapid diagnostic testing of saliva samples for SARS-CoV-2. medRxiv. 2020 Jun 16:2020.06.13.20129841. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.13.20129841.
8Cheuk S, Wong Y, Tse H, Kwong T, Chu M, Yau F, et al. Posterior oropharyngeal saliva for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:2939-46.
9Jamal AJ, Mozafarihashjin M, Coomes E, Powis J, Li AX, Paterson A, et al. Sensitivity of nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin Infect Dis 2020;25:848.
10Kamate SK, Sharma S, Thakar S, Srivastava D, Sengupta K, Hadi AJ, et al. Assessing knowledge, attitudes and practices of dental practitioners regarding the COVID-19 pandemic: A multinational study. Dent Med Probl 2020;57:11-7.
11Cagetti MG, Cairoli JL, Senna A, Campus G. COVID-19 outbreak in North Italy: An overview on dentistry. A questionnaire survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:3835.
12World Health Organization. Considerations for the Provision of Essential Oral Health Services in the Context of COVID-19: Interim Guidance; August 03, 2020. Available from: https://apps.WHO-2019-nCoV-Oral_health-2020.1-eng.pdf. [Last accessed on 2020 July 23].
13American Dental Association Responds to World Health Organization Recommendation (August 12, 2020): Dentistry is Essential Health Care. Available from: https://www.ada.org. [Last accessed on 2020 Oct 25].
14Ahmed MA, Jouhar R, Ahmed N, Adnan S, Aftab M, Zafar MS, et al. Fear and practice modifications among dentists to combat novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:2821.
15Peng X, Xu X, Li Y, Cheng L, Zhou X, Ren B. Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice. Int J Oral Sci 2020;12:9.
16Meng L, Hua F, Bian Z. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Emerging and future challenges for dental and oral medicine. J Dent Res 2020;99:481-7.
17Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:E1000097.
18Bragge P, Clavisi O, Turner T, Tavender E, Collie A, Gruen RL. The global evidence mapping initiative: Scoping research in broad topic areas. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:92.
19Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Critical Appraisal Tools. South Australia: The University of Adelaide; 2018. Available from: http://joannabriggs. org/ research/ critical-appraisal-tools.html. [Last accessed on 2020 Oct 25].
20Mulimani PS. Evidence-based practice and the evidence pyramid: A 21st century orthodontic odyssey. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;152:1-8.
21Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim Infection Prevention and Control Guidance for Dental Settings during the COVID-19 Response. Atlanta, GA, USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/ coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/dental-settings. [Last accessed on 2020 Oct 25].
22Dominiak M, Różyło-Kalinowska I, Gedrange, T, Konopka T, Hadzik J, Bednarz W, et al. COVID-19 and professional dental practice. The polish dental association working group recommendations for procedures in dental office during an increased epidemiological risk. J Stoma 2020;73:1-10.
23Zhang XH, Ling JQ. Guidelines on the prevention and control of disease in dental practice during the coronavirus outbreak. Chin J Dent Res 2020;23:89-94.
24Ather A, Patel B, Ruparel NB, Diogenes A, Hargreaves KM. Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19): Implications for clinical dental care. J Endod 2020;46:584-95.
25American Dental Association. ADA. Interim Guidance for Management of Emergency and Urgent Dental Care; 2020. Available from: https:// www.ada.org/ media/ CPS/ Files/COVID/ADA Int_ Guidance_Mgmt_ Emerg-Urg_Dental_COVID19. [Last accessed 2020 Oct 24].
26British Dental Association. Coronavirus: Your FAQs; 2020. Available from: https://bda.Org/advice/ Coronavirus/Pages/faqs.aspx. [Last accessed 2020 Oct 20].
27Indian Dental Association. Covid19Alert; 2020. Available from: https:// ida.org.in/Home/Covid-19Alert. [Last accessed 2020 Oct 20].
28Panesar K, Dodson T, Lynch J, Bryson-Cahn C, Chew L, Dillon J. Evolution of COVID-19 guidelines for University of Washington oral and maxillofacial surgery patient care. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;78:1136-46.
29French Society of Stomatology, Maxillo-Facial Surgery and Oral Surgery (SFSCMFCO). Practitioners specialized in oral health and coronavirus disease 2019: Professional guidelines from the French society of stomatology, maxillofacial surgery and oral surgery, to form a common front against the infectious risk. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;121:155-8.
30COVID-19 Guidelines for Dental Colleges, Dental Students and Dental Professionals by Dental Council of India. Available from: https:// dciindia.gov.in/Admin/News Archives/DCI%20Guidelines%20on%20 COVID-19. [Last accessed 2020 Oct 20].
31Abramovitz I, Palmon A, Levy D, Karabucak B, Kot-Limon N, Shay B, et al. Dental care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak: Operatory considerations and clinical aspects. Quintessence Int 2020;51:418-29.
32National Guidelines for Infection Prevention and Control in Healthcare Facilities. National Centre for Disease Control, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; January, 2020. Available from: https://www.mohfw.gov.in/ pdf/National%20.Guidelines%20for%20IPC%20in%20HCF%20-%20 final%281%29. [Last accessed 2020 Oct 25].
33Tajima Y, Suda Y, Yano K. A case report of SARS-CoV-2 confirmed in saliva specimens up to 37 days after onset: Proposal of saliva specimens for COVID-19 diagnosis and virus monitoring. J Infect Chemother 2020;26:1086-9.
34Yoon JG, Yoon J, Song JY, Yoon SY, Lim CS, Seong H, et al. Clinical significance of a high SARS-CoV-2 viral load in the saliva. J Korean Med Sci 2020;35:e195.
35Amorim Dos Santos J, Normando AG, Carvalho da Silva RL, De Paula RM, Cembranel AC, Santos-Silva AR, et al. Oral mucosal lesions in a COVID-19 patient: New signs or secondary manifestations? Int J Infect Dis 2020;97:326-8.
36Martín Carreras-Presas C, Amaro Sánchez J, López-Sánchez AF, Jané-Salas E, Somacarrera Pérez ML. Oral vesiculobullous lesions associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Oral Dis. 2020 May 5:10.1111/odi.13382. doi: 10.1111/odi.13382.
37Yang JR, Deng DT, Wu N, Yang B, Li HJ, Pan XB. Persistent viral RNA positivity during the recovery period of a patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Med Virol 2020;92:1681-3.
38Han MS, Seong MW, Heo EY, Park JH, Kim N, Shin S, et al. Sequential analysis of viral load in a neonate and her mother infected with SARSCoV-2. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:2236-9.
39Azzi L, Carcano G, Dalla Gasperina D, Sessa F, Maurino V, BajA. Two cases of COVID-19 with positive salivary and negative pharyngeal or respiratory swabs at hospital discharge: A rising concern. Oral Dis. 2020 Apr 25:10.1111/odi.13368. doi: 10.1111/odi.13368.
40Martínez Lamas L, Diz Dios P, Pérez Rodríguez MT, Maria Teresa PR, Victor Del CP, Jorge Julio CG, et al. Is povidone iodine mouthwash effective against SARS-CoV-2? First in vivo tests. Oral Dis. 2020 Jul 2:10.1111/odi.13526. doi: 10.1111/odi.13526.
41Raja ZH, Shaheed M. Misinformation about COVID-19 and dentistry on the internet. Biomedica 2020;36:241-6.
42Yang Y, Zhou Y, Liu X, Tan J. Health services provision of 48 public tertiary dental hospitals during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:1861-4.
43Guo J, Xie H, Liang M, Wu H. COVID-19: A novel coronavirus and a novel challenge for oral healthcare. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24:2137-8.
44Xu H, Zhong L, Deng J, Peng J, Dan H, Zeng X, et al. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int J Oral Sci 2020;12:8.
45Carter E, Currie CC, Asuni A, Goldsmith R, Toon G, Horridge C, et al. The first six weeks-setting up a UK urgent dental care centre during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br Dent J 2020;228:842-8.
46Liu X, Zhou J, Chen L, Yang Y, Tan J. Impact of COVID-19 epidemic on live online dental continuing education. Eur J Dent Educ 2020;24:786-9.
47Saccomanno S, Quinzi V, Sarhan S, Laganà D, Marzo G. Perspectives of tele-orthodontics in the COVID-19 emergency and as a future tool in daily practice. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2020;21:157-62.
48Giudice A, Barone S, Muraca D, Averta F, Diodati F, Antonelli A, et al. Can teledentistry improve the monitoring of patients during the covid-19 dissemination? A descriptive pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:3399.
49Bidra AS, Pelletier JS, Westover JB, Frank S, Brown SM, Tessema B. Comparison of In vitro inactivation of SARS CoV-2 with hydrogen peroxide and povidone-iodine oral antiseptic rinses. J Prosthodont 2020;29:599-603.
50Yu J, Zhang T, Zhao D, Haapasalo M, Shen Y. Characteristics of endodontic emergencies during coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in Wuhan. J Endod 2020;46:730-5.