|Year : 2022 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 384-389
Extended cervicomastoid approach with sternocleidomastoid flap reconstruction for parotid surgery: A better esthetic technique
Priyanka Srivastava1, Sunil Kumar2, Abhishek Bahadur Singh2, Manish Chandra2, Hitendra Prakash Singh2
1 Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, Super Speciality Cancer Institute and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
|Date of Submission||16-Jun-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||15-Sep-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||11-Jul-2022|
Dr. Sunil Kumar
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Aim of the Study: The aim of the study is to compare the esthetic outcome of extended cervicomastoid approach with reconstruction with conventional approach (modified Blair's incision) for parotid surgery.
Materials and Methods: 48 patients were enrolled and grouped into A: surgery through extended cervicomastoid incision with sternocleidomastoid reconstruction and B: surgery through modified Blair's incision. After parotid surgery, patients were followed up to 6 months on the basis of flap ischemia, patient satisfaction, and cosmesis (visual analog scale [VAS]).
Results: In our study, preauricular depression over the face was present in 4.2% and 95.8% patients Group A and B at 6 months, respectively (P < 0.001) and retromandibular depression (70.8%) in Group B (P < 0.001). Subjective Frey's syndrome was present in 8.3% of patients of Group B (P > 0.05). The mean value of VAS between the two groups was 1.08 ± 0.28 and 3.29 ± 0.62 at 6 months (P = 0.001) while mean change was significantly (P = 0.03) higher in Group A (1.00 ± 0.00) as compared to Group B (0.20 ± 0.72) from postoperative to 6 months, respectively. Patient of Group A had good satisfaction level (62.5% and 91.7%) at 6 weeks and 6 months while Group B patients had fair satisfaction level (87.5%) at 6 weeks and poor satisfaction level 79.2% at 6 months.
Conclusion: Parotidectomy through extended cervicomastoid incision with sternocleidomastoid flap reconstruction experienced lower rates of postoperative complications, flap necrosis, and gustatory sweating in comparison to cervicomastoid facial approach, and thus, the previous incision is esthetically superior that allows cheek contour reconstruction with no increase in operative time or postoperative complications.
Keywords: Extended cervicomastoid incision, modified Blair's incision, parotid tumors, salivary gland
|How to cite this article:|
Srivastava P, Kumar S, Singh AB, Chandra M, Singh HP. Extended cervicomastoid approach with sternocleidomastoid flap reconstruction for parotid surgery: A better esthetic technique. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2022;13:384-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Srivastava P, Kumar S, Singh AB, Chandra M, Singh HP. Extended cervicomastoid approach with sternocleidomastoid flap reconstruction for parotid surgery: A better esthetic technique. Natl J Maxillofac Surg [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 26];13:384-9. Available from: https://www.njms.in/text.asp?2022/13/3/384/350364
| Introduction|| |
Parotid gland tumors account for 80% of salivary neoplasm and 3% of all tumors of head and neck. These neoplasms are mainly benign and account for 2% to 6% of all head-and-neck pathologies., Benign histological types are pleomorphic adenoma, Warthin tumor, myoepithelioma, basal cell adenoma, and oncocytoma while in malignant tumors, most frequent are mucoepidermoid carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma, acinic cell carcinoma, myoepithelial carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, basal cell carcinoma.,,
Modified Blair's incision offers excellent surgical access to parotid gland but it inevitably leaves visible scar, retraction of facial scar, and increased risk of flap ischemia. To overcome these esthetic issues, retroauricular hairline incision, rhytidectomy incision, facelift incision, and minimal incision are being used. Small incision in parotid surgery is not suitable for malignant tumor with or without skin involvement, facial nerve or skull bass involvement or parapharyngeal extension as restricted exposure further lead to facial nerve injury, incomplete resection, poor adaptability for neck dissection, and increased risk of flap ischemia.,
Total or superficial parotidectomy especially when reconstructive technique is not used, leads to preauricular and retromandibular contour deformity with scar. There are various options to overcome this contour deformity such as sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) flap, superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap, and temporoparietal fascial flap. Reconstruction helps to maintain facial symmetry, dissimulating the postparotidectomy retromandibular depression, and Frey's syndrome. Sternocleidomastoid flap has extra advantage over other flap as it receives multiple blood supply from the occipital artery, superior thyroid artery, and transverse cervical artery, therefore, it can be used either as a superiorly or inferiorly based flap.
To combat the above complications, we used an extended cervicomastoid approach which has advantage such as no preauricular scar, reduced risk of flap necrosis and less retraction of scar. In addition, we used SCM flap to avoid Frey's syndrome and to preserve facial contour. It provides better cosmetic results without compromising surgical exposure and increasing surgical time.
Sternocleidomastoid muscle flap
- Lower risk of skin injury during flap design
- An ability to provide a larger width and length of muscle tissue that can be interposed
- Ease with flap design and axis of rotation after parotidectomy
- Well vascularized
- No additional skin incision required
- No significant decrease in function of SCM.
- Bulky size of flap may mask recurrences in the parotid bed.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Ethical Clearance was obtained from Institutional Ethical Committee with Ref no.777/Ethics/R.cell/18 dated 02-07-18. 48 patients were studied in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck surgery during period of August 2017 to July 2018 and divided into two groups, namely Group A: patients undergoing parotid surgery using extended cervicomastoid incision with obliteration of defect by SCM flap and Group B: patients undergoing parotid surgery using modified Blair's incision without SCM flap.
- Patients included were in age group 10–60 years
- Cases with benign parotid tumor requiring surgical management
- Patients of age <10 years and more than 60 years
- Patients with any systemic illness or comorbidities
- Patients with parotid malignancy/recurrent case and arteriovenous malformations.
All the patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. After complete hematological, radiological, and cytological investigations, patients underwent superficial or total parotidectomy depending on extension of benign parotid lesion.
For an extended cervicomastoid approach, the patient's neck was extended and the head rotated to the opposite side. An incision was started from the postauricular area and it was continued in the cervical area in upper neck skin crease [Figure 1]. Incision was continued through subcutaneous fat on to the SCM and thick skin flap was elevated. The facial nerve was identified and dissected carefully. Parotidectomy (superficial/total) was done depending on the pathology. After removal of tumor, SCM flap was used to obliterate the defect to avoid Frey's syndrome and dimpling [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. Skin closure was secured with interrupted sutures using vicryl 4-0 and nylon. In modified Blair's incision, surgery was performed similarly to that of extended cervicomastoid incision group except that the type of incision differed. All patients were followed up to 6 months postoperatively on the basis of flap ischemia, cosmesis (visual analog scale [VAS]), subjective Frey's syndrome, retromandibular, preauricular depression, and patient's satisfaction.
Data collected were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS software version 26.0. Data were summarized as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical group were compared by Chi-square test. Two tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Obseravations and Results|| |
The mean age of Group A and Group B was 35.67 ± 13.07 and 31.25 ± 12.64 years, respectively. 58.3% patients of Group A 50% of Group B were males [Table 1]. There was no significant (P > 0.05) difference in age and gender between the groups. Pleomorphic adenoma was the most common tumor (87.5% in Group A and 83.3% in Group B, P = 0.38).
Preauricular and retromandibular depression
[Table 2] shows preauricular depression in 4.2% and 95.8% patients of Group A and Group B at 6 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Retromandibular depression was present in 70.8% patients in Group B (P < 0.001). Flap ischemia was not present in any patients in Group A, however, it was present in 12.5% patients in Group B at 1 week postoperatively.
Frey's syndrome and visual analog scale
Subjective Frey's syndrome was absent in Group A and present in 8.3% patients of Group B (P > 0.05) [Table 3]. The mean value of VAS between the two groups as 2.08 ± 0.28 and 3.50 ± 0.51 at postoperatively, 1.75 ± 0.53 and 3.42 ± 0.50 at 6 weeks, and 1.08 ± 0.28 and 3.29 ± 0.62 at 6 months, P = 0.001) [Table 4]. The mean change in VAS was significantly (P = 0.03) higher among the patients of Group A (0.33 ± 0.48) as compared to Group B (0.08 ± 0.28) from postoperative to 6 weeks and from postoperative to 6 months in Group A (1.00 ± 0.00) compared to Group B (0.20 ± 0.72), respectively [Table 5].
|Table 3: Comparison of subjective Frey's syndrome between the groups across the time periods|
Click here to view
|Table 4: Comparison of patient's satisfaction between the groups across the time periods|
Click here to view
Patients of Group A had good satisfaction level (62.5% and 91.7%) at 6 weeks and postoperative 6 months, respectively, while Group B patients had fair satisfaction level (87.5%) at 6 weeks and poor satisfaction level (79.2%) at 6 months postoperatively [Table 6].
|Table 6: Comparison of VAS between the groups from post-operative to subsequent time periods|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Superficial parotidectomy is a well-known treatment for benign tumors. The first description of a specific incision for parotidectomy was given by Gutierrez in 1903 since then many modifications in the incision has been made to deal with hypertrophied scar, a permanent noticeable depression over cheek and gustatory sweating.
In conscious patients' stigma of visible facial scar following the parotid surgery may lead to severe psychological distress. Sometimes, these visible scars are interpreted by patients as an unfavorable result of surgery and with the passage of time, patient's anxiety may be directed away from the pathological cause of surgery by fixation on the visible scar. This is the reason why appropriate selection of the incision becomes important which can provide a technically good access to the surgery while ensuring good postoperative cosmesis.
Tumor characteristics and presenting complaints
The pathology was similar into groups; pleomorphic adenoma was the most common histological diagnosis (21 out of 24 in Group A; 87.5% and 20 out of 24 in Group B; 83.3%). Swelling was the most common presenting complaint (100%) followed by mild pain over the swelling 16.6%. There was no complaint of facial weakness, restricted jaw movement, decreased sensation over involved area, intraoral swelling, recurrent tumor, and cervical lymphadenopathy. In the study conducted by Poland otolaryngologist Pietniczka-Zaleska concurred that 100% of his patients had swelling as presenting complaint.
Postoperative outcome measures
In our study, in Group A, using extended cervicomastoid incision, there was no flap ischemia in 1 week. In contrast, Group B, flap ischemia was present in 12.5% patients. Due to sharp angulation over mastoid part of incision, there is compromised vascular supply in modified Blair's incision so there are more chances of flap necrosis in Group B patients. Warren E. Hagan and Anderson found that in traditional incision's sharp angulated vertical segment due to the interruption of subdermal capillary blood flow as it nourishes the elevated skin flap may results in devitalization at the tip of the flap at the junction beneath the lobule of the ear.
Preauricular and retro-mandibular depression
In patients of extended cervicomastoid incision with SCM flap, preauricular depression was present in 4.2% patients at 6 months while in patients with modified Blair's incision 95.6% patients had at 6-month postoperative period. Retromandibular depression was present only in Group B in 70.8% of patients at 6 months. This marked difference was due to bulk of SCM flap interposed between the skin and bed of dissected parotid.
Subjective Frey's syndrome
In our study, 8.3% of patients with modified Blair's incision without reconstruction had subjective Frey's syndrome at 6-month follow-up while it was absent in patients with extended cervicomastoid incision with reconstruction at 6 months. Nofal and Mohamad found that the superiorly based SCM flap partial-thickness lowers the incidence of Frey syndrome objectively and subjectively. Gooden et al. studied that the SCM flap may play a significant role in reducing the incidence of Frey's syndrome and maintaining facial contour after parotidectomy.
Visual analog scale
The mean VAS score in patients with extended cervicomastoid incision remains toward lower side (more satisfaction) in comparison to patients with modified Blair's incision (less satisfaction). Using extended cervicomastoid incision, there was no visible scar and no significant preauricular and retromandibular depression. Nofal and Mohamad found that the superiorly based sternocleidomastoid flap partial thickness offers a reasonable cosmetic option for reconstruction following either superficial or total parotidectomy by improving the facial deformity. Patient satisfaction was more when extended cervical mastoid incision with sternocleidomastoid flap reconstruction was used. There were no significant differences in operative time and location or size of tumor or completeness of resection.
Therefore, in this study, we found that there were better postoperative outcomes in group where extended cervicomastoid incision with reconstruction was used. The esthetic outcome and complications related to parotidectomy can be minimized using this incision which improves quality of life of the patient and better functional outcome.
| Conclusion|| |
Tumors of parotid gland are generally removed by the standard modified Blair's incision without reconstruction of parotid bed. Progress in surgery continues to be made in arriving at less deforming and more cosmetic surgical results. Hidden incision is not only feasible but often preferred and possible too in parotid surgery.
In this study, we observed patients who underwent parotidectomy for benign tumors through extended cervicomastoid incision with SCM flap reconstruction experienced lower rates of postoperative complication such as flap ischemia and gustatory sweating in comparison to the modified Blair's approach. An extended cervicomastoid incision for parotidectomy provides generous access to most regions of the parotid gland which is as good as the access provided by modified Blair's incision.
In conclusion, it is advisable for otorhinolaryngologist and head-and-neck surgeons to adapt extended cervicomastoid incision to the patients who are concerned about the cosmetic results of surgery. However, first and foremost there must be no doubt about the indication for the procedure with the respect of size location and histological characteristics of the tumors.
The extended cervicomastoid incision provides a safe alternative approach to parotid tumors and adequate exposure for even total parotidectomy. It offers improved patient satisfaction without additional risk of complications.
I would like to acknowledge Prof. S. P. Agarwal (former professor and head Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck surgery, KGMU) for his time-to-time guidance.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Tweedie DJ, Jacob A. Surgery of parotid gland: Evolution of technique, nomenclature and a revised classification system. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:303-8.
Speight PM, Barrett AW. Salivary gland tumours. Oral Dis 2002;8:229-40.
Spiro RH. Salivary neoplasms: Overview of a 35-year experience with 2,807 patients. Head Neck Surg 1986;8:177-84.
de Oliveira FA, Duarte EC, Taveira CT, Máximo AA, de Aquino EC, Alencar Rde C, et al.
Salivary gland tumor: A review of 599 cases in a Brazilian population. Head Neck Pathol 2009;3:271-5.
Tian Z, Li L, Wang L, Hu Y, Li J. Salivary gland neoplasms in oral and maxillofacial regions: A 23-year retrospective study of 6982 cases in an eastern Chinese population. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39:235-42.
Guzzo M, Locati L, Prott F, Gatta G, McGurk M, Licitra L. Major and minor salivary gland tumours. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2010;74:134-48.
Upile T, Jerjes WK, Nouraei SA, Grant W, Singh S, Sudhoff H, et al.
Further anatomical approaches to parotid surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010;267:793-800.
Kim DY, Park GC, Cho YW, Choi SH. Partial superficial parotidectomy via retroauricular hairline incision. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2014;7:119-22.
Phookan J, Chatterjee P. Small incision parotid surgery. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2016;15:31-5.
Kim S, Mathog R. Platysma muscle-cevical fascia-sternocleidomastoid muscle (PCS) flap for parotidectomy. Head Neck 1992;21:428-33.
Roh JL. Extracapsular dissection of benign parotid tumors using a retroauricular hairline incision approach. Am J Surg 2009;197:e53-6.
Foustanos A, Zavrides H. Face-lift approach combined with a superficial musculoaponeurotic system advancement flap in parotidectomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;45:652-5.
Pietniczka-Załeska M, Dabrowska-Bień J. Parotid tumors: A two-year experience of otolaryngology department at MSS hospital in Warsaw. Otolaryngol Pol 2009;63:43-6.
Hagan WE, Anderson JR. Rhytidectomy techniques utilized for benign parotid surgery. Laryngoscope 1980;90:711-5.
Nofal A, Mohamad M. Sternocleido mastoid muscle flap after parotidectomy. Int Arch Otorhynolaryngol 2015;19:319-24.
Gooden E, Gullane P, Irish J, Katz M, Carroll C. Role of the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap preventing Frey's syndrome and maintaining facial contour following superficial parotidectomy. Head Neck 1999;21:428-33.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]