Home | About us | Editorial board | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Search | Submit article | Instructions | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact us |  Login 
National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery
 
Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 33
 


 
Table of Contents
CASE REPORT
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 89-91  

Rehabilitation of single finger amputation with customized silicone prosthesis


Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication19-Dec-2016

Correspondence Address:
Niharika Yadav
Department of Prosthodontics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow - 226 003, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0975-5950.196141

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Finger amputations are common in accidents at home, work, and play. Apart from trauma, congenital disease and deformity also leads to finger amputation. This results in loss of function, loss of sensation as well as loss of body image. Finger prosthesis offers psychological support and social acceptance in such cases. This clinical report describes a method to fabricate ring retained silicone finger prosthesis in a patient with partial finger loss.

Keywords: Finger amputation, finger prosthesis, mechanical retention, silicone finger prosthesis


How to cite this article:
Yadav N, Chand P, Jurel SK. Rehabilitation of single finger amputation with customized silicone prosthesis. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2016;7:89-91

How to cite this URL:
Yadav N, Chand P, Jurel SK. Rehabilitation of single finger amputation with customized silicone prosthesis. Natl J Maxillofac Surg [serial online] 2016 [cited 2017 Mar 26];7:89-91. Available from: http://www.njms.in/text.asp?2016/7/1/89/196141


   Introduction Top


Hands are capable of performing a huge range of activities from gentle and precise actions to industrial strength. Human hands normally have five digits or phalanges on each hand. Trauma, congenital abnormality or disease can lead to partial or complete loss of fingers. Traumatic finger amputation results in dramatic impairment in hand function. It leads to loss of strength, grasp, and marked psychological trauma.[1] When surgical reconstruction is not feasible due to rehabilitative or financial constraints, fabrication of artificial prosthesis is considered.

Silicone is the material of choice in fabricating finger prosthesis due to acceptable strength and durability.[2] To aid in retention of the prosthesis, adhesives, or mechanical methods can be incorporated. Certain ornaments such as ring and bracelet provide mechanical retention. This article presents a case of a patient, rehabilitated with finger prosthesis for amputated finger of the left hand.


   Case Report Top


A 21-year old female patient reported to Department of Prosthodontics for rehabilitation of amputated finger on her left hand [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. History revealed that patient lost her finger 11 years back in a traumatic injury by mechanical lathe. The wound was healed without any sign of infection or inflammation. The patient had no history of the previous prosthesis. Due to required available residual digit length, it was planned to use ring as a mode of retention.
Figure 1: Prerehabilitation dorsal view

Click here to view
Figure 2: Prerehabilitation ventral view

Click here to view


Treatment procedure

After lubricating the finger with thin layer of petroleum jelly (Vaseline, Hindustan Unilever Ltd., Mumbai, India), remaining digit was duplicated with irreversible hydrocolloid impression material (Zelgan 2002, Dentsply Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon, Haryana, India). Vaseline facilitates easy removal of impression without tearing. Impression was poured with dental stone (Type 3 Labstone, Kalabhai, Karson Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India) and cast was retrieved. Dorsal and ventral aspects were marked on cast to later provide an orientation of wax pattern. Area of remaining digit which was designated for contact with silicone prosthesis was scraped 1 mm uniformly on cast, for snug fit of prosthesis.

Donor hand was selected from the departmental outpatient department, with contours and dimensions similar to that of the patient. Selecting a donor hand prevents the laborious task of sculpting the wax pattern. The impression of donor finger was obtained in slightly flexed position and poured with modeling wax (Modeling wax no 2, Hindustan Dental Products, Delhi, India). Wax pattern was hollowed and adapted to scraped digit mold. The nail was fabricated with autopolymerizing clear and pink acrylic resin and trimmed to appropriate shape and size. After incorporating nail, wax pattern was tried on patient's hand for evaluation of contour, fit, and dimensions [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Wax pattern try-in

Click here to view


Wax pattern was invested in a way to obtain dorsal and ventral halves in a separate flask. Visualizing the basic skin color, silicone was intrinsically colored in natural daylight and packed into the mold. After curing for 24 h at room temperature, prosthesis was finished and polished. Extrinsic staining was done, and prosthesis was delivered to the patient [Figure 4] and [Figure 5]. Instructions were given regarding use and maintenance of the prosthesis. Ring aids in retention as well as hide the junction of prosthesis and finger.
Figure 4: Postrehabilitation dorsal view

Click here to view
Figure 5: Postrehabilitation ventral view

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Body deformity may cause physical, emotional, and psychological as well as social damage to the patient.[1] Therefore, most of the patients with finger amputation are primarily concerned with cosmetic appearance rather than function. Microsurgical replantation is not possible in all the patients due to several causes such as lack of facility, severely crushed fingers, lack of awareness in patient, and treatment failure. In such cases, finger prosthesis can provide good quality of the cosmetic result, with newer materials, methods and clinician's expertise.[3]

Silicone is preferred over other materials in this case because of it is durability, strength, texture, light weight, and life-like appearance.[4] Silicone also improves immature hypertrophied scars by hydration.[5] Ring can be used as a mode of retention when certain part of phalanx is present. In case of remaining phalanx shorter than required height, other methods such as adhesives, implants, or other retentive devices are considered.[6] If patient's opposite hand is used to fabricate wax pattern, different angulation need to be corrected by sculpting. In this case, using donor hand for wax pattern fabrication reduced the time required for sculpting.[7] Due to pollution, cosmetics, sunlight and chemicals, silicone prosthesis may not retain color in long-term.[4] The patient should be recalled after a certain interval to assess the prosthesis and repair it if required.

Pilley and Quinton assessed psychological response to digital prosthesis in 15 patients, using ring as a mode of retention. They reported that psychological and esthetic improvement was achieved and valued by the patient.[3] Pereira et al. fabricated 136 digital prostheses for 90 patients. Retention and fit of the prostheses were achieved through modification of the inner circumference of the mold.[8] Ring retained silicone prosthesis is a simple, durable, acceptable, and cheap treatment option in a developing country scenario, as compared to other costly options such as implants.


   Conclusion Top


Fabrication of life-like finger prosthesis is no more a challenge due to the availability of newer materials and improved methods. A well fabricated, esthetically pleasing prosthesis helps in re-establishing the lost self-confident of the patient. It is the primary responsibility of the prosthodontist to restore the function, comfort, and esthetics with a well-fabricated prosthesis. Hence, a simple method to fabricate ring retained finger prosthesis was attempted and found successful.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Lundborg G, Brånemark PI, Rosén B. Osseointegrated thumb prostheses: A concept for fixation of digit prosthetic devices. J Hand Surg Am 1996;21:216-21.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Huber H, Studer SP. Materials and techniques in maxillofacial prosthodontic rehabilitation. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2002;14:73-93.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Pilley MJ, Quinton DN. Digital prostheses for single finger amputations. J Hand Surg Br 1999;24:539-41.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Michael J, Buckner H. Options for finger prosthesis. J Prosthet Orthot 1994;6:10-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Burkhardt A, Weitz J. Oncologic applications for silicone gel sheets in soft-tissue contractures. Am J Occup Ther 1991;45:460-2.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Scolozzi P, Jaques B. Treatment of midfacial defects using prostheses supported by ITI dental implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:1395-404.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kaira LS, Dabral E. Improving esthetics of finger prosthesis by glove silicone. J Orofac Sci 2014;6:114.  Back to cited text no. 7
  Medknow Journal  
8.
Pereira BP, Kour AK, Leow EL, Pho RW. Benefits and use of digital prostheses. J Hand Surg Am 1996;21:222-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed105    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded25    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal